What's it like, you ask, to be in a doctor's office
and be told you have an 80% chance of being dead in two years?
It sucks. It sucks the air from your lungs, the tears from your
wife, and the images of a complacent old age with a passel of grand-babies
running underfoot from your head.
But there are still certain things
that suck more.
Movies? Well, perhaps that's a bit dramatic,
but let me tell you something: some movies cause cancer. I can
blame my stage 4 colon cancer (and the two tumors in my liver) on three
particular movies.
Irreversible
When does art have the power to cause colon cells to mutate? When
it's Gaspar Noe's thematic masterpiece Irreversible.
From the opening kaleidescope of nausea - a precursor to the
purgatory that is chemotherapy - to the final spasm of green,
this movie is designed to cause cancer. The film is presented
in segments of action, shown in reverse order, which further
complements the theme of the irreversible effects of causality
and hinting at the essence of time.
Make no mistake, this movie was
tested scientifically to cause cancer. How many lab rats had
to die from watching the unflinching rape scene? "Rape
scene?" you
ask, hopeful of an eyeful of Monica Bellucci's boobies. This
powerful twenty minutes of fear, pain and degradation will churn
your guts into a self-replicating mass of out-of-control cells,
and not even register an errant nipple on the radar of your mind. When
will this torture end? Do you turn it off? You can't bring yourself
to admit defeat in the face of blatant abuse and disgust. You
are now Tina Turner with a trio of tenacious tumors.
With all
that being said, the movie must be recognized as pure art, thematically
whole. Not only is the storyline irreversible, but the viewer
- you - have been irreversibly damaged. Ejecting the disc is
just the beginning of your new, damaged self. You have been violated.
You are now victimized, as surely as a rape victim. The cells
in your colon know this and revolt. These tiny warriors are staging
their insurrection, and the aftermath is irreversible. You have
cancer, and the dream of taking your life for granted is shattered.
Where are the artists striving to make a masterpiece from good,
wholesome themes? Could there be a cure for cancer if humans
weren't so fascinated by pain and torture mixed with sex? Gaspar Noe,
the quintessential Frenchman puffing despondently on his cancer stick,
will never stoop to such spiritual depths. Fascinated by death,
Noe has inflicted a cancer upon humanity. And he planned it all along. “Life
eez sheet, and zen you die.” Thanks,
you bastard. All I wanted was a joyous spin through eighty or
so orbits. Thanks for reminding me of all the pain there is in
the world, 'cause you know? I almost forgot. Now I have cancer,
and the spins make me want to throw up. I'm sure you're pleased,
no matter how hard you deny it.
Freddy Got Fingered
How Tom Greene escaped Freddy Got Fingered with
only the loss of one nut should give comfort to anyone afflicted
with cancer. Unfortunately, some cancer patients don't get off
Freddy's invasive finger so easily. This hodge-podge of vile
non-sequitur and inane shenanigans doesn't have the brains to actually cause cancer,
so much as exacerbate existing tumors. After all, prostate cancer
is almost always curable, so who really needs such inept fingering?
I'd give this terrible, offensive, pointless movie a more vicious
thrashing, but just writing about it is bound to give the remaining
tumors in my liver extra energy. Their insurrection is about
to be resected in three short weeks, and they don't need the negativity
Freddy Got Fingered feeds
it any more than Mrs. Murphy's cow needed a pail of kerosene.
Xanadu
Which brings me to the most cancer-causing agent the other side
of a flat-panel display. This movie derives its carcinogenic
properties by emulating another cancer-causing agent - saccharine.
Picture, if you can, condensing all the icky sweetness of your little
sister's childhood into ninety minutes. Rainbows, unicorns, a
Greek muse, a cartoon montage
replete
with twittering love birds - all these elements come together
to create a musical of carcinogenic proportions. Gene Kelly slumming
it in his old age with the quintessential femme-bot Olivia Newton
John... their combined power mixed to create the perfect anti-chemotherapy
concoction: Xanadu.
Cancer is a sugar-feeder, after all, and the cotton candy that
is Xanadu feeds
it sugar by the shovelful. This is not the antithesis of Irreversible
- it is not the unbridled joy of being alive. This is Irreversible's
shadowy doppelganger. While Irreversible focuses on the irreversible
effects of pain, Xanadu explores the acidity of overwrought sweetness. This
is chemical sweetness, like aspartame or sucralose, and it
defies the entropy of your consciousness. It defies any mental
division, just as those chemical sweeteners defy the breakdown
of your digestion. There is no joy in Xanadu. There is nothing
but the empty calories of the empty interface of the future and the
past. This emptiness, like a vacuum in space and/or time, is now filled
with the ever-expanding cancer.
Well, there you have it. The three movies that gave me cancer. Like
eating a pound of steak, these movies will sit in your colon like a
fat man on a dry water slide. Please, for the love of all those who
love you, avoid these movies. Fiber up with some Kurosawa,
some Gilliam, some Miyazaki. Flush these movies from your colon; poop them
from your mind. Go organic and let that artificial garbage rot on the
shelves of Netflix. Life is short and shouldn't be thrown away on movies
like this. Suicide is frowned upon by the patterns of the universe and
God. Don't piss them off. Learn from my mistakes. You've been warned.
|