| France isn’t exactly well known for their horror output. In fact,
aside from a few true classics, not even that much horror exists from
the 1960s-1980s. There are a number of reasons for this, but it boils
down that “Les fantastiques” weren’t very profitable,
and better options were constantly being imported from the U.S.,
Britain and Italy. Why should they bother?
That’s not to say there weren’t any horror films out there
or directors that wanted to make them. Hell, one of the most classic
horror films ever came out of France. Georges Franju’s Eyes
Without a Face told the story of an obsessed surgeon whose daughter
became disfigured in a car crash. In attempt to give his daughter her
beauty back, he kidnaps young girls and surgically removes their faces
in attempt to graft them on to his daughters. It was released a few years
back on DVD in the States by Criterion. It’s a classic macabre
story of madness, and like all fantastic stories, they are worth retelling.
Because of this, the same plot has been rehashed plenty of times over.
Jesus Franco even did two different variants on the same theme. It must
have been a popular tale in France with as many retellings as it received,
and in 1970, Claude Mulot put his own personal touch on the story in The
Blood Rose.
The story here is told in three parts beginning with a segment called “The
Past.” We are introduced to Frédéric Lansac (Philippe
Lemaire, Assassination
in Rome) a popular painter who becomes increasingly disinterested
in his socialite girlfriend Moira (Elizabeth Teissier, Castle
Keep) as he becomes more and more obsessed with his new muse,
Anne (Anny Duperey, Les Femmes). He eventually leaves
his wife for her and they move to a remote chateau. True love
does indeed blossom between the two of them. Many successful
paintings are made thanks to Anne’s voluptuous body and the two
enjoy their new locale and spend every moment together that they
can. At a party following their wedding, a jealous Moira returns
to confront Anne for stealing her ex-husband from her and, during
a scuffle Anne ends up falling into a pile of burning rubble.
Anne’s
beauty is damaged, she’ll
never be able to walk again and her vision has been irreparably
altered.
Frédéric is distraught. He’s lost the ability and
ambition to paint but he still stands by his beloved Anne. But as hard
as Frédéric is taking it, Anne is suffering even more so,
bordering on madness. Frédéric into a kind of semi-seclusion
since she won’t leave the mansion for fear of being seen, and won’t
have any outside hired help for the same reasons, that is except for
his two mute dwarves Igor and Olaf. An attempt to hire a live-in nurse
named Agnes (Michéle Perello, Girl Slaves of Morgana Le
Fay) ends in failure as Anne tricks her into watering a rare
hybrid plant with thorns that will instantly kill anyone that touches
it. Now forced to coverup a murder in his own chateau, Frédéric
will to anything to make Anne beautiful again. An unexplored option is
discovered when he overhears that his botanist business partner Römer
(genre veteran Howard Vernon, The Awful Dr. Orloff himself)
is also an ex-surgeon barred from medicine for performing disfiguring
a child during a surgery that was well out of his league. Together the
two of them, however unwillingly, look for beautiful women with even
more beautiful faces that they can kidnap in hopes of successfully transplanting
theirs on to the disturbed Anne.
It’s here that the film enters shameless rehash territory, although
it admittedly takes a long time to get there. Either way you look at
it there is a problem. If you can get past the fact that you’ve
seen this all before you are going to get mighty impatient by the pacing
of the whole thing, as well as loose plot threads. The first “WTF” comes
with the Moira character in the first act. Essentially she is responsible
for “killing” Anne (as far as the outside world knows) but
nothing at all is mentioned of her following the accident. What ever
happened to murder charges? Manslaughter? Crime of passion? Fuck, man,
give me some sort of real goddamned vengeance here. For all intents and
purposes Moria just killed a bitch and vanishes like the last Twinkie
at a fat kid’s birthday party.
But the film includes midgets and nudity, right? It can’t be
that bad, can it? Well except for the fact that the midgets don’t
do anything except look scruffy, stare at things and get berated by the
far more monstrous Anne for just not being helpful enough. And
what’s going on with the names Olaf and Igor, anyway? When the three writers
got together to adapt this story, did they use their set of Short European
Men of Horror flashcards to select these characters’ names? I mean,
can you get more unsurprising? As for the nudity, well the girls
are hot in this film, of this there is no doubt, but the nudity is relatively
toned down. Think of a Hammer film with more skin being bared than usual,
and you got a pretty good idea as to how it looks and feels. There is
nothing exploitative about the film, and for the most part its attempts
at eroticism fail since the overall nature of the film is grim. For a
film that was advertised to U.S. audiences as “The First Sex-Horror
Film Ever Made!” (a statement that is definitely debatable) anyone
looking to The Blood Rose for some sexy time is going
to be fairly unfulfilled.
But the film does have some bright points that make it worth a viewing
and keep things interesting. The atmosphere is fantastic. Everything
seems like a fantasy, and there is something sinister from the start
of the crumbling chateau and the land that it’s on. This is evident
even at the start of the film when everyone is mostly happy and carefree.
It’s this benefit that works well for European horror especially
viewed by Americans. The “old world” look and feel to the
architecture and history behind it evokes a special sense of the unknown
to us. I imagine that most of Europe would be like, “It’s
just another bloody castle!” or as the French would say, “Pisse
au loin, merde-tête Américain!” Still, walking around
these old structures is indeed foreign, and quite mysterious. Frédéric’s
chateau has that effect. The acting is also quite good considering
the B-level that the film is. Philippe Lemaire and Howard Vernon put
in fantastic performances with Vernon’s being multilayered and
unsure of his actions in every scene. His self-restraint is admirable,
and it further allows Lemaire’s steady decent into madness to be
allowed proper examination without competition. Even in the final acts,
when a new character, Agnes’ sister Barbara (Olivia Robin, in her
only role ever) comes searching for her sister, the quality of acting
never suffers. In fact, I can’t think of a film off a genre film
off the top of my head that every actor, despite how vital they are to
the film, gives off performances of such consistency. It’s refreshing,
especially when you take into account how many of these actors never
stepped outside of the world of French B-films.
But The Blood Rose is still something of a disappointment
due to its unoriginal plot. Sure there are alterations, but not nearly
enough. The one interesting added element, the titular plant that is
used to kill Agnes is never mentioned again, and although comparisons
could be drawn to Anne herself being a blood rose – once beautiful,
but now killing everyone she touches – I would have liked to see
it used more as an actual device. It would have further separated the
film from Eyes Without a Face and made The Blood
Rose worthy of greater notoriety.
The DVD Presentation
Mondo Macabro’s mission since they began releasing DVDs was to
find obscure cool fringe films and make them available to interested
parties. So far, they’ve done nothing but deliver on that. The
Blood Rose is no exception, but I bring up their mission to
justify that while the film is now available, and in anamorphic OAR no
less, the transfer isn’t exactly stellar. Now, I’m not complaining,
I’ve paid good money for films that look far, far worse, but The
Blood Rose’s image quality isn’t up to Mondo’s
usual high standards. This is no doubt because of the negative they used.
It’s a bit on the soft side and there seems to be some color shifting,
which was probably always the case due to the film stock used in low-budget
films at the time. It isn’t terribly distracting, and the transfer
otherwise is marvelous. So kudos must be given to MM for even releasing
it. The audio is much better. 2.0 Mono soundtracks are included for both
the original French and an English Dub. I listened to both, and the English
dub is pretty unexciting. French is definitely the way to go here. English
subtitles are naturally included.
And the Extras Are?
About the Film –
It’s pretty standard for a great text piece to be included with
Mondo Macabro DVDs, and it more than makes up for the lack of a printed
insert. This article, “Ravaged – The Blood Rose and Horror “Made
in France” by Pete Tombs, does a great deal of putting the film
in context with the climate of filmmaking in the late sixties in France.
Then it goes on to exemplify the influences that the film and director
Claude Mulot had which continue to this day. It’s a good read.
Interview with Didier Philippe-Gerard – (23:09)
Since Mulot is long deceased, this interview with his collaborator
Phillipe-Gerard helps fill in the gaps of what Mulot was like and how
filmmaking was accomplished in France at that time. It’s a spoiler
filled interview (in French, but subtitled in English) so it should
only be watched following the film. It does help give the film an added
perspective since The Blood Rose was far more taboo
in the era it was made than it is now. I especially enjoyed the reasoning
for the nudity in the film and the examination of what makes Mulot a
different director than Jean Rollin and why the horror genre failed
to be big in France. Philippe-Gerard is a valuable resource of information
on Mulot, and I’m pleased to have been able to watch this interview.
Cast & Crew Bios –
Four bios are included for director Claude Mulot and actors Phillipe
Lemaire, Anny Duperey and Elizabeth Teissier. Since I wasn’t overly
familiar with any of the cast or crew, I found them all to be very informative;
particularly Teissier’s which spoke of her “special relationship” with
President Francois Mitterand.
Stills Gallery –
20 stills are included in the gallery, which include both publicity
stills under the films various names, as well as promotional artwork.
I enjoyed flipping through this.
“More from Mondo Macabro” Trailer – (6:25)
Found on most Mondo Macabro DVDs in one form or another, this
anamorphic widescreen “trailer” of sorts shows clips of
other available titles from the distributor. So if you’re interested
in seeing what The
Bollywood Horror Collection, The
Devil’s Sword, Satan’s
Blood, Virgins
from Hell or Parts are
like, this compilation can give you a quick look.
The Bottom Line
I didn’t find The Blood Rose to be particularly
engaging, erotic or even horrific. The plot is nearly identical to Eyes
Without A Face, a far superior film. What The Blood
Rose does have going for it is the cool sets and atmosphere
that oozes through the film. You won’t kick yourself for watching
it, but you’re not going to find much else of interest.
That is, beyond the nudity and midgets.
And really, that should be standard in every film.
|