|
Let me make this quick because The Possession of Joel Delaney isn’t
worth talking much about, and thanks to Legend Films and Paramount not
slapping anything on their latest cult releases, there isn’t much
to the disc, either. The Possession of Joel Delaney is
a drab little bit of nastiness right out of Paramount Pictures, circa
1972. When speaking of the movie, most people will point out the fact
that it came out a few years prior to the more upscale The Exorcist,
and that seems to be Delaney’s soul credit, even
with Shirley Maclane in the starring role. What kind of possession
movie is this? A good example of Delaney’s low-rentedness
comes with the simple fact that the title character isn’t even
possessed by Satan.
Maclane plays Norah Benson, a rather vapid socialite who has lived
with money for so long, you can just imagine the phrase “Do you
know who I am” fly through her mouth at any moment in time. Norah’s
the big sister of Joel Delaney, who has recently moved into his deceased
friend’s apartment. Joel’s friend Tonio just happened to
be a psychotic killer decapitating young women in Central Park, by the
way, so you can see what kind of company Joel keeps. He might have been
murdered by his father six months prior, but Tonio’s soul has managed
to enter Joel’s body, forcing him to do things, unnatural things, evil things.
Despite the fact that Norah goes to Spanish Harlem and gets in contact
with fire walking Voodoo priests, she still can’t accept the theory
that her brother is possessed by Satan Tonio – obviously a bad
choice. Unable to take her brother’s growing insanity/possession,
Norah, the thinker than she is, takes her kids and retreats to a secluded
beach house. Joel, the thinker that he is, tracks them down,
only to torture them in ways that would make Eli Roth writhe around in
displeasure.
I feel kind of sick saying it, but the ending of the film is all The
Possession of Joel Delaney has – a monstrous little bit
of Grand Guignol featuring switchblades, naked children and dog food
that comes off like Paramount trying to one-up the exploitation flicks
of the day. But that’s what The Possession of Joel Delaney does
to you – it presents to you something so bland, so paint-dryingly
dull that when you’re faced with a naked child being given a dog
food swirlie, your interest perks up no matter what. The movie’s
pacing is so snail-like, you will sigh in relief when the children get
cut up.
I can’t be the only one, right?
Despite how heinous the ending is (Roger Ebert uses the word “bankrupt” in
his review of the film multiple times, and he wrote Beyond The
Valley Of The Ultra Vixens!), a bankrupt conclusion isn’t
going to improve the previous 90-minutes of the film.
Presentation
Legend Films might deserve props for putting out the film, along
with a slew of other cult titles (including motherfuckin’ Student
Bodies, motherfucker), but the presentation, and I’m
assuming the film elements themselves, are pretty rundown. While the
print is mostly free of harsher defects – dirt, scratches, burns,
cuts and what-have-you – it’s still dull, a tad too red
(I think, a friend of mine just gave me a television and I haven’t
touched the video settings– I now have four televisions, by the
way), full of grain and just dull. Legend tends to go overboard on their
own properties, remastering, even colorizing a few of their titles,
and it’s strange to see this film in such a condition.
Ditto the audio. So inconsequential, I don’t even have to write
about it. I’m tweezing the hair off my big toe instead of describing
the audio to you, it’s so insignificant. Besides, I’ve got
a court date this week. There’s bigger fish to fry.
Extras
Nothing. Nada. You get zip. No Shirley MacLane commentary track.
No Perry King posthumous retrospective. And you know what? I’m
thankful about that.
The Bottom Line
The Possession of Joel Delaney wants to have its cake
and eat it too, but the minimal high-points (and I’m using the
term “high-points” loosely just so I don’t come off
as too weird) just don’t make up for the low-points that
make up roughly 90% of the film.
|