Main
Feature Synopsis The Wolf Man
Larry Talbot returns to Wales
in order to live on his father's estate. While trying to save
a local woman from a vicious wolf attack, Talbot is bitten
and is soon saddled with the curse of the werewolf Upon the
rise of each full moon, he changes into a wolf and seeks to
kill the people he loves. This classic Universal monster movie
features state of the art effects and a fantastic cast, including
Lon Chaney Jr. and Claude Rains.
Cary's
Impressions
Amazingly enough, when it comes to the Universal horror movies
of the 1930s 1950s, my favorites aren't Frankenstein or Dracula. Technically, Frankenstein is the best of the
franchises. Historically, Dracula is arguably the most
enduring. However,
I would pass up either of those for a chance to watch The
Wolf Man for the 4,724th time. It is my second
favorite of the Universal horror films (the first being The
Creature From The Black Lagoon).
Why?
Good question. The acting in Frankenstein is marginally better. The menace of Dracula is greater.
The story for both is more established and better developed
than The Wolf Man.
I guess it boils down to location and character.
While The Wolf Man was set in Europe, the scenery was
mostly mist covered forest and the main character had an American
accent. I lived in South Florida which was full of oak forests
and plenty of early morning mist. While there were no wolves
to speak of, there were plenty of bobcats and other dangerous
things in those woods, so the creepiness factor was high.
Walking home from a friend's house late at night,
I couldn't begin to imagine the Frankenstein monster or a
vampire popping out to get me from behind a tree, but I damn
sure could imagine a werewolf doing it. and I prayed that
it would actually happen. I wanted the curse to pass on to
me!
There is nothing I wanted more from the age of
eight until the present than to be a werewolf. Just think
about it! You get to run around, tearing shit up, howling
and marking your territory. Sure, you may kill a loved one
periodically, but I think I could work around that and still
have a loving and active family life.
To
this day I still think Universal's 1941 movie The Wolf
Man starring Lon Chaney, Jr. holds its own against all
of the other Universal movies. Chaney may not have been the
actor Lugosi or Karloff were, but this role was perfectly
suited for him. When
he first starts pursuing Evelyn Ankers (as Gwen, the girl
in the antique store whom he's fallen for), his mannerisms
are actually wolfish in the "womanizer" sense of the word.
His confusion and introspective manner after his transformation
work perfectly in this film (in later films he would overplay
the Larry Talbot character in a way that was annoying as hell).
Chaney was also an average looking guy. He didn't have the
dark, brooding facial features of Karloff and Lugosi. He was likeable from the outset.
Of course, his supporting cast is as strong as
he is. Claude Rains is very strong as Chaney's father (even
though it's completely unbelievable that Rains could actually
be Chaney's father). He plays his scenes very naturally and
his performance is possibly the
strongest in the film. Bela Lugosi makes an appearance (unfortunately
very small) as the man who passes along the curse to Chaney.
His scene reading Fay Helm's palm (she plays Gwen's ill-fated
friend Jenny Williams) is extremely fun.
The
best performance in the entire movie, though, has to go to
Maria Ouspenskaya as the gypsy woman Maleva. I'm not sure
how much of a stretch it was for her, but I can tell you now
that there hasn't been a more convincing gypsy woman on screen
since her appearances in this film and its sequel
(Frankenstein Meets The Wolf Man). She is mysterious, vulnerable
and foreboding all at the same time. Every time she's on the
screen your eyes are drawn to her.
Is
the script as strong as Frankenstein or Dracula?
No, but those movies had very good novels to draw from. The
Wolf Man is a creation unto itself, and you have to give
Curt Siodmak credit for that. Here's a guy who created an original script that gives
you the feeling there is history and tradition behind the
legend of the werewolf, where in reality, most of what is
in the script is completely from Siodmak's head. That's something
that most screenwriters never achieve. The stories of wolfsbane
blooming under a full moon, the pentagram scar and the poem
about "Even a man who is pure at heart." all sprang from Siodmak's
brain. These are brilliant pieces of "folklore" that became
gospel in other werewolf movies for years to come.
There are better werewolf movies out there. The
Howling and An American Werewolf in London being
two I can name right off the top of my head, but neither would
have come about without The Wolf Man. The movie stands
the test of time rather well, and even the transformation
effects still hold up to scrutiny sixty five years later.
On my personal list of favorite horror films
this ranks soundly in the top ten. I highly recommend it.
Shawn's
Impressions
Out of all the classic monsters Universal Studios has given
us, I don't think any of them affected me quite so much as
a child as The Wolf Man. Every one of the other "monsters"
was just that. Dracula was a vampire, Frankenstein's monster
was made up of corpses, and The Mummy was a really friggin'
old Egyptian. I couldn't relate so I wouldn't be scared by
them. The Wolf Man is a different beast altogether, though.
Lawrence Talbot wasn't always a monster, and he didn't even
realize at first that he became one. The viewer couldn't become
any of the other monsters, but they could be the Wolf Man.
That's some scary shit.
That said, I don't think The Wolf Man holds up quite as well today. It didn't "age" in the traditional
manner, but that's not the problem. I aged, and that's the
problem. I've seen far too many werewolf movies since that
blow The Wolf Man out of the water. It isn't a bad
film, but there are a myriad of ideas going through its script
that never really get fleshed out. Observe.
For
whatever reason, the Talbot family only allows the first son
to inherit anything. Sir John Talbot, Lawrence's father, makes
a big deal about this to Lawrence when he returns after his
brother's death. No explanation is offered from Sir John as
to why they hold this tradition, and even less of an explanation
is offered as to why Lawrence would be so forgiving. When
you take into account how Lawrence made himself whatever he
is today and then see how forward he is in approaching an
engaged woman soon afterwards, admitting to her that he first
saw her while playing Peeping Tom, you tend to think this
guy has some serious balls.
With such a ballsy lead, destined to soon become
a feral werewolf, you might expect him to have at least some
degree of ferocity upon learning that he was one. Instead,
Lawrence turns into a suicidal bleeding heart, and continues
that way through every sequel. Larry please, the silver bullet
goes in the gun, gun goes in the mouth past the teeth. It's
not hard.
There
are some other half-assed things about the film. First, the
werewolf that bites Talbot is played by Bela Lugosi, and the
characters name is. Bela. Seriously folks, that's stupid.
But at least it isn't as stupid as the fact that Bela turns
into the historical style werewolf the four-legged variety.
Therefore, why Talbot would turn into a two-legged beast with
a less shaggy Benicio Del Toro haircut is unexplained. Fun
ideas are brought up, but undeveloped. Wolfsbane is mentioned,
but its use as a catalyst of lycanthropy isn't mentioned.
The werewolf sees a pentagram on its next victim before he
turns, yet it is also used as a protection when worn. Hell,
you don't even see the moon in the entire running time (a
fact I never realized until listening to the commentary.)
The Wolf Man had some great potential,
but unfortunately is kind of the bastard child of all the
Universal monsters. This is a shame really, since Chaney is
rather good in it and its sequels, and the monster is incredibly
menacing in fight sequences. Sadly, this is better shown in
the sequels than the original.
Page 1 | Page
2 | Page 3 | Next
> |